More about the flu
Rich and I were blogging back and forth a little about the flu and I realized I hadn’t put up this link, which epitomizes my concerns about this whole hubub. I do think that there are reasons to be concerned about the possible sudden spread of an infectious disease, like the flu – though I think Ebola’s more theatrical – and we should be taking reasonable steps to be prepared for it. But the whole thing is still very speculative, and we have real problems that are much less speculative. There are going to be more hurricanes this year, whether you believe in global warming or not, and I think those are a more pressing concern that the flu.
But the issue of the link is also pressing – opportunists will be taking their best shot at using this to further their own agenda. I’ve heard Bush call for the same kind of martial law. All this about a disease that has killled <100 people in 5 years. Shouldn't we be more concerned with the continuing suck-ass distribution of AIDS assistance to Africa? I mean there's a disease with a track record of killing people in large numbers. 30,000 people are going to die this year of other flu strains in America. That's a factor of 1200 more (America's 1/4 the world population). More than that will die of car accidents. Hell, more have been struck by lightning. Yes, being unprepared for bird flu could lead to a lot of deaths, but the hype is way out of proportion to the assesable threat. And a bird flu pandemic is not the only bad thing that could happen.