Newsgroups: sci.physics,sci.chem,alt.religion.kibology Path: news.cinenet.net!news.ececs.uc.edu!news.kei.com!news.mathworks.com!uunet!in2.uu.net!world!kibo From: kibo@world.std.com (James "Kibo" Parry) Subject: Re: Proving the Actinide Atom Totality Universe Sender: news@world.std.com (Mr Usenet Himself) Message-ID: X-Hello-To: Archimedes Plutonium Date: Wed, 8 Jul 1998 05:43:32 GMT X-Battlestar-Galactica-Date: 9931 centons, 78 microns, .01 nutria References: <6ni6ko$313$1@dartvax.dartmouth.edu> <6nkkri$48k$1@dartvax.dartmouth.> <6nknad$688$1@dartvax.dartmouth.e> <6nmn9i$em$1@dartvax.dartmouth.edu> <6nol8e$q9b$1@dartvax.dartmouth.> <6nptt8$cgp$1@> <6nra55$ios$1@node2.nodak.edu> <6nsh0m$ko2$1@dartvax.dartmouth.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp0a027.std.com Organization: welcome datacomp X-Newsreader: MT-NewsWatcher 2.4.4 Followup-To: alt.religion.kibology Lines: 53 Xref: news.cinenet.net sci.physics:137209 sci.chem:55728 alt.religion.kibology:67646 X-Cache: nntpcache 1.0.6 (see ftp://suburbia.net/pub/nntpcache) In four sci.* newsgroups, Archimedes Plutonium (Archimedes.Plutonium@dartmouth.edu) wrote: > > Superdave the Wonderchemist (thweatt@prairie.NoDak.edu) wrote: > > > > Who IS this guy? Maybe he should try taking some physics before > > continually posting and following-up to his own posts about absolute > > nonesense. > > [...] > You should go into something easier than the sciences, you will not > make it big in science. But there's nothing easier than the sciences. I mean, everything there is either right or wrong and you can figure out which it is by looking it up in the CRC Hanbook. But try philosophy -- in philosophy you never even KNOW if you're right! In fact, if you ever figure out that you're right, it invalidates your entire life's work and you have to start over -- at an even lower salary than the usual philosopher! > Don't bother responding your in my killfile now. Can I be in your killfile too? Or to phrase it in words you can understand... Can I be in you're killfile to? > And a further comment. How old are you that you need a Dave > Wonderchemist name. That alone tells me that you are pretentious and > foolish and you do not have the brains for science, perhaps a grade > school teacher in science YAY! Archimedes "Emperor of Science" Plutonium flamed someone for having a pretentious and silly name! A few days ago, in three sci.groups, Archimedes PLutonium explained everything: > > This week I had a craving for coconuts, fresh coconut. I often get it > by Mounds candy bars. But I had the craving for fresh. > > [...] > I try to post these research reports but alas there are only 24 hours in > a day, and due also to the fact that I am in virtually every science, > that I cannot have perfect coverage of all the sciences. I am the King > of Science, and doing the best job I can. You know, any REAL king who spent all day posting to Usenet would probably get poisoned after a few days on the throne. -- K. So I say we get Archie a throne!